Friday, 30 March 2007

Designers I look up to...





Eero Saarinen - another architect's son... deftly bridged the gap between international-style modernism and modern expressionism... he's brilliant... his work ventured across all scales... from furniture all the way to masterplans... he did flowing sexy lines way before CATIA/CAD, and way before modern industrialized construction methods. He's an idol for me (and for others like me) who take up after our mentor-fathers. He died way too early for his time at 51 years... but despite his relatively short period in the design spotlight, his prolific, masterful work and conscious bent to educate people and cheer the profession continues to echo today.

Architecture critics have questioned his significance mainly because of his short professional life span, but have rediscovered the depth and breadth of his work and writings. At ease both in front of corporate suites and bohemian artists, Eero was the quintessential architect-practitioner-theoretician, who put forward and implemented a lot of his concepts/ideas on context, the figure/ground relationships, technology, etc.

Carlos Arguelles - The quintessential Pinoy Modernist. Sadly, as prolific as he was and as beautiful his buildings are/were. There is virtually no current of discussion among design circles about his work, proof of this is the dearth of photos/articles about him online... yes, although he was hot in the 50s, his gems have survived him and show the early traces of Modern Regionalism that has spread through-out the world as architects/designers from all-over have slowly adapted the International-style Miesian box into something more suited for their respective countries/cultures. The Rizal Theater (as shown) and the Philamlife Building along Taft Avenue are beautiful pieces, with their facade depth, and clarity of structure, both testament to the depth and clarity of thought of the man who designed/worked on both of them. He's as old-school modern as old-school modern gets back here in the Philippines... (although there are a lot of other architects who've had better press with more projects, I'll toss my vote in for the lesser recognized/less talked about dude. The Nakpils, etcs have had their time in the sun.)
















Paul Rudolph
- another old-school, mid-period modernist, he rarely gets the props he deserves, mainly because of his late period work, wherein his hardcore, cold, objective bent on work adapted an even more harsh aesthetic, his brutalist period. He got a lot of flack for the Yale Architecture building (not shown) for being too overbearing, dark and dreary, but if you do look back to his early work, especially his Florida Houses, you'll be surprised to see something much lighter, with ingenious circulation/parti and incredible clarity/legibility even at the level of illustrations. He was known among his peers as an incredible illustrator of ideas. Even as his popularity declined because of the neo-classical/ornamental drift of the 70s-80s, he continued to do his thing in Asia, with built/unbuilt projects in HK, Singapore, etc. testament to his belief in architecture as a means of healing and improving cities and their urban/street-level conditions... and even bigger proof of his savvy dealing with all sorts of clients, from the american, artsy designer-house owner, to the cut-throat, competitive asian businessman. He let his work... and his lines do the talking.

Leandro Locsin and Francisco Manosa - ah yes... for Pinoy designers... no explanation needed. Both these men are proponents of Philippine Architecture during their heydays...

Lindy, (Leandro... my parents named me after him) took the cudgels of Filipino Modernism from the likes of Carlos Arguelles and the Nakpil Family and took it several steps further. His talent and intuition for design is amazing. His first key project, the UP Chapel of the Holy Sacrifice, hinted at the creative prowess he had brewing within. His story is one of rare celestial alignment, wherein talent/ability gets fused together with his pedigree/connections, and family wealth. I would like to believe that even if he was handicapped by fate, even if history did not have the Marcoses (see CCP photo at left, etc.) and their megalomaniacal tendencies take over the Philippine design world, Lindy would have done well for himself, because of his talent, savvy and sheer prolific creativity. Indeed, its tough to be named after this dude. But its also an honor to have a semblance of connection (albeit forced) to his existence. (Although... I have another thing to say about that... I'll write about it some other time) He admits to being heavily influenced by 2 names mentioned above (Eero and Paul Rudolph), moreso during his later work as he moved away from his Corbusian modernism, to more expressive, raw, heavy... yet light, brutalist work.

Bobby (Francisco Manosa) I've had the pleasure to work in his office for a summer internship, where I really didn't do much in an architectural sense, but to tell you frankly I learned a lot just by standing around next to the plotter waiting for the prints to finish. He is one of the few local architects who make a strong stand for vernacular architecture. If its architectural modern regionalism that you want... this is as good as it gets for the Philippines. He has stubbornly adhered to and spearheaded the Filipino vernacular language of architecture, fusing together the old Spanish colonial sensibilities, Filipino environment and materials, with American/Western programming/requirements. All of this has cost him, as prospective clients have shied away from his office because of the fear that he would impose his look on their commercial projects. Despite this, he has shown that despite his no-compromise stance, the vernacular language is incredibly adaptable to modern design. He is the tireless, forever throaty-voiced cheerleader for Filipino Architecture. While the academe continues to semantically debate the existence of Filipino Architecture. He's there outside on the ground (not literally of course) running and practicing it, without compromise. He's lost a lot of good people through the years. Partners have migrated, started their own firms (and even got some of his clients and staff) but his influence will always be there. Heck I know... after 3 months working for him. I still get daydreams about bahay-kubo skyscrapers and offices.

At the risk of sounding cheesy, I'll also have to name my dad, Leonardo Poco, as one of the architects I look up to (syempre). He has come a very long way from his roots in Lingayen, Pangasinan. Coming from a family without any design background... from the first generation of farmers/Chinese immigrants from Xiamen, to the second/third generations of educated professionals: accountants, teachers, and more accountants... he blazed the trail for the "artistic" side of the family. (We now have 3 architects in the family)

Early success include the EPROM 1976 International Design Competition, wherein he won the right to represent the Philippines in Canada. The world was a lot larger then, and for a barrio boy to go all the way there through a competition (ok... it was a group competition, but he did lead and push his team to get it done) and stand side-by-side other nationalities, thats no small feat.

His early professional work (like most designers) is a search for bearings, ranging from modern to pomo, I'd have to say his best early work would have to be the Mile Long Building (where we hold office) along Amorsolo St. in Makati. Yes, it is a postmodern reference to the Mile Long Barracks in Corregidor, and yes... the owners/developers (The Rufinos) did have a lot of style/taste to venture into that direction, but its rhythm, simplicity, cleanliness and timelessness are indications of talent brewing within.

My love for architecture is something learned and acquired by watching him ever since my first summers hanging out at his drafting room in his office. Although our professional relationship sometimes resembles the TV Show "American Chopper", wherein the father-sons go through a continuous love-hate-work-deadline relationship, with the staff/team members befuddled as to what to do... I love working with him because it feels great to contribute something that you are really part of, and to learn from a consummate practitioner. Yes, I do get the urge to strike out and go on my own, but timing is everything, and I believe that in this case (as with most Parents and Children who have the same line of work/interests), our fates are truly intertwined. Its been a learning process not just for me, but for him as well, as we both learn to adjust to each other's thought-processes. I'm learning to shut-up and think/draw more, while he's learning to listen.

I'm amazed not just by his work, but more for his innate, patient/yet demanding, mentoring nature. (just ask our team) Impartial to the core, non-controversial unlike Manila's many pr-seeking designers, incredible taskmaster/manager... I'm learning all about the practice from a guy who runs a tight ship. His balanced/well-rounded view on the profession and his personal life (from design to business strategy, real estate, management, work ethic, family life) is something I'm learning as I shift from the studio mindset to the practice set-up.

I believe his best work is still ahead of him, and his best lessons for me and the team are still to come.


Photo credits (right click and view image for addresses/locations)




Postscript...

In my tired haste I forgot to mention a couple more names of designers/architects I really look up to for their work and principles:

Ralph Johnson of Perkins and Will Architects in Chicago - This Walrus-like guy has made quite a name for himself within the established firm of Perkins and Will by pushing their modernist vocabulary forward.

I particularly admire and study his campus plans and school buildings which are expositions of his understanding of co
ntext, depth, scale and proportion and unified design. Although he has also done a lot of vertical towers and highrises (like Skybridge, pictured above) his mastery of scale, proportion and detail have shown in both small/horizontal campus work and verticals.


Richard Meier - One of the few architectural monograms we had at home back when I was in grade school was a book on Richard Meier. I used to look at the pictures and study the precision/clean lines he'd do with his buildings. His work takes after Le Corbusier's principles and takes them several steps higher. From his residential work showing a clear, defined parti/flow of spaces from constriction to release; to the masterful weaving of his buildings together with the existing urban fabric, on plan, his work has shown an incredible level of legibility, procession and functionality. Aesthetically, his white boxes aren't the boring boxes of yesteryear, but are actually very playful collages of light, shade, depth and massing. His early work (back in the 60s) such as the Smith house has remained timeless and is testament to the ageless quality of modernism. Of course, he did run through a period of doubt in his aesthetic when the Postmodern wave of eclectic revivals and pastiche design became the cool/in thing in the U.S., but Meier found a safe haven and a fertile ground for his concepts in Europe where his buildings had a strong civic presence that helped weave/stitch together tattered downtowns. His work almost borders on the classical in how he combines traditional concepts on proportion/scale and civic beauty in projects such as the Getty in California, the MoCA in Barcelona and the Jubilee church in Rome.

Sambo Mockbee and Glenn Murcutt - both singular practitioners, The late Sambo
founded the Rural Studio and helped bring social consciousness back into the hearts of architects and designers. The program has been heralded in marshalling together good design, sustainable/recycled technologies, architectural education and social work all in one roof.
One piece of little-known trivia about Sambo is that he was part of the team of consultants that came over during the Expo1998 Centennial preparations to help the local group set in motion plans for the celebration.

Pritzker Prize winner
Glenn Murcutt is an Australian solo practitioner who has a waitlist of projects because he takes on things one at a time. The award of the Architecture "Nobel" to him was refreshing because it just goes to show that in an era of glitzy and glamorous starchitects, the solo practitioner out in the boondocks can do great work, regardless of the publicity. He has been known for implementing a no-nonsense approach to his work, integrating his clean modernist functional/outback aesthetic with sustainable technologies that allow his buildings to "Touch the Ground Lightly" which is an aboriginal mantra about how man should tread on this world.

Please do let me know if I have inaccuracies... I am writing this off the top of my head... maybe you'd have a few insights and favorite designers yourself too.

Saturday, 24 March 2007

I guess I'm set for something else...

When a door closes, a window opens... and I'm sure its all according to the Big Guy's Plan... 
What the hey... I'm young, I've been accepted to NUS for M.Urban Design, we're working on a few good projects...
what more could I ask for... I still have a lot of miles left on my wheels and I hope to gain more experience
and do more work/pass the boards... so I guess this is God's little way of narrowing down the dizzying choices.

Although... I really would have enjoyed the chance to live/learn/work there... but the story doesn't end with this one yet:


March 23, 2007


Dear Applicant,

Thank you for applying to the Master of Architecture program at the
University of California, Berkeley.

I am writing to inform you that you have not been accepted for graduate
study in the Department of Architecture.

The material submitted with your application has been reviewed by the
admissions committee of our department. They have informed me that
they
are unable to recommend you for admission to the program.

Our department has the difficult task of selecting students with the
strongest overall records, from a large pool of well-qualified
applicants. Due to the strict enrollment ceiling of the Berkeley
campus,
each department may only admit a limited number of new students every
year. Unfortunately, this may result in not being able to accept many
applicants who are capable of excellent academic work.

I am sorry that my letter does not bring you good news and hope that
you
will be offered other opportunities to achieve your academic goals. My
apologies also that we were unable to send you a personalized message,
unfortunately our current email system does
not allow us to do so.

Sincerely,

Renee Chow, Associate Professor
Chair of Graduate Advisors
Eva Li Chair in Design Ethics


Saturday, 17 March 2007

Prime Fallacy

From what you've seen on my page, I might sound like I'm contradicting myself with this post, but follow my line of thought while I expound...

I was at WORLDBEX (World Building Exposition at the WTC Manila) the other day looking for new products and methods/techniques we can make use of for our work, and to grab brochures for detailing work and the BT part of the Boards, was also hoping to run into a few people along the way (and I did)... but the highlight of the exhibit for me would have been the architectural design section by Manila's bigger, and more pr-savvy firms...

I think that the number one fallacy contained in everyone's thought/idea of architecture is the Fallacy of the Beautiful Drawing.

From the start of one's career in design, we are immediately pigeonholed as persons who draw/color/illustrate well. I couldn't blame people for thinking like that because thats precisely the only thing they see about the profession... the pretty drawings, the fancy lines, the colors, the dreamy images, etc.

I myself am guilty of this as I've peppered my online/actual portfolio with perspectives, elevations and a few plans...

But as I get older and learn more about the line of work, I'm realizing that drawing per se is really just another language or means to communicate an idea, a solution, a strategy, a concept or an emotion.

What most people don't realize is that the beautiful perspective you see is just the product of a process, that depending on the designer/s may be one or a combination of the ff.:

- a deep, intense, iterative, learning-filled, emotional, fiery process  (something resembling a long drawn-out  thesis)

- a eureka moment, wherein you just stand there at the beginning of a project, look at the site... and just get it...

- a scatterbrained, protracted and oftentimes disheartening wandering through a pastiche of ideas and imagery... just like Moses and the Israelites...

- an artistic binge of cramming... (ala school work again) wherein you just wait and do nothing for days hoping that inspiration hits you... and you end up coming up with really crappy work... frustrated that the idea is so clear in your head, but execution wise... you didn't get to do it right because of time constraints...

- design as a business/management procedure wherein you just try to slap something and get it done so as to efficiently bill the client... and get paid... before the real creative thought happens...

I guess, people don't realize that for every finished building, designers did so many iterations on the original concept... sacrificing layers upon layers of hopia/tracing paper (I consume about half a ream of a4 tracing paper a week).

At the end of the day... what you're exhibiting in your drawing or work is not the image... but the quality of thought, the depth of process that you took to arrive at your work. (OR THE lack thereof)...

Whats frustrating is... when you see something slapped or built without much evidence of thought... when one perspective is merely slapped onto another creating pastiche after pastiche of work...
[
Architecture/design is supposed to be a process/journey of thought... not just the photoshopping of imagery... THAT'S the ideal to strive for...

I feel like I'm kicking myself in the ass too... hehehehe...

Sunday, 11 March 2007

Random Update

The past weeks have been hectic, and I'm still adjusting and getting myself in gear. I've always been a diesel tractor when it gets to work...  A lot of the work on the church was revised, and now, I'll have to take the point position in bringing these revisions to completion.

Frustration is starting to mount as I begin to confront the limitations in budget, in technology, in ability, in execution, in imagination... not just in the other people involved in the project, but in me as well. Its been said that an architect is lucky to even get 15% of his ideas built, because these get hacked and trimmed down the moment it leaps from your imagination onto the blank sheet, into the bytes of your CAD file, and onto the hands and raw concrete on site. Thats the reality. And we all have to find the middle ground between our ideals and thoughts and the world. That is our burden.

Review has been crazy. Structural design has been a pain, more so when you consider that a few of the items being discussed were never taken up in school, and are never encountered for real on the site. What's worse is when you end up with an instructor who finds more comfort in talking to the board than to the bewildered audience, complete with eyes splayed and gawking at the beautiful yet alien symbols and variables chalkblasted on the board.

Building Technology is an even bigger pain when you start realizing just how much you don't know yet. What's worse is when you run into an instructor who is more interested in showing off just how much he knows compared to us, and humiliating students. I understand that the first step to learning is to realize you know nothing. We get the point. When will you stop being a show-off... and when do you start being a mentor?

Its all been a humbling/enlightening process. I've learned quite a few things, not just about the boards... but more about the people and society around me in general, about the systems in place, about social ironies, and how some of my decisions in the past were undisputedly correct.

The past week has exposed a lot of my good and bad misconceptions about people.  All the more things look providential and part of a much bigger plan. Its all amazing, in retrospect... and even more exciting when I realize I'm right smack in the middle of it. The challenge now is to get over the whole 3rd-person point of view, and get back into the thick of things and get it done.

Back to work for me. Its been a considerable challenge to keep myself focused despite the many distractions that modern living has built in for us. (such as this blog) Inspiration has been in short doses lately, (who am I kidding? more like... A LONG TIME) But alas... that can wait.

Until the next dose of free time!